Category Archives: Op-Ed Pages

It’s Not “Just” Sex

Published January 17, 1999

If you ask Aurelia Davis[i], it’s all about sex.  She got her chance on Tuesday to meet with the Supreme Court of the United States and explain.  She and her attorneys told why her daughter LaShonda, a fifth grade student at the time, would feel degraded, abused, humiliated, and threatened by the physical and verbal sexual aggressions of a male student.  LaShonda had expected her teachers and principal to take action.  But, evidently, they thought her complaints were just about sex.

Ask other parents.  How many of us are worried about our children and the possibility of teen pregnancy, date rape, STD’s, unwed mothers, abortions and AIDS?

How many parents are worried about the role models available for their children?  We know Jerry Springer and MTV as examples of the sexual values transmitted on television.  Even national sports heroes give a bright spotlight to sexual abuse and exploitation that is minimized in the media as a “boys-will-be-boys, indiscretions” of manhood.  At least parents were able to point to the leaders of our country as examples of sexual integrity.

What about women in business?  If not for the President with the sexy blue eyes, sex in business is labeled abuse.  Women spent years legally gaining acknowledgement that “Sex is Power.”  Every major corporation posts notices to their employees warning that sexual harassment is punishable by law.  Sex between working associates is forbidden.  Consenting or not, it is forbidden.  Business leaders know that sex is more than pillow talk.  It’s access to power, to money, to status.  It is the ultimate manipulation.  It’s not just sex.

What about family values so important to politicians at election time?  Families are held together by the sacred marriage vow of loyalty and devotion given in front of  friends and family.  Simple words of “fidelity” are vowed in a human “oath.”  Sex is vowed as an act of love and commitment.  How do politicians expect to lead America back to “family values” if they can’t demonstrate the inviolability of a marriage oath?  Never mind an oath to a grand jury in a court of law.

What about today’s students?  Vast monies have been spent telling young people their best defense against drugs, sex, and violence is only three words:   Just Say No.  We moralize as adults, telling students they have the power to choose the right.  Schools are toughening their discipline codes, telling students they must pay the consequences of bad choices.  If we expect them to say “no,” and to accept consequences, how will we explain President Clinton to them?

On January 12, Aurleia Davis, her daughter LaShonda, and attorneys of the National Women’s Law Center were in court to remind the Supreme Court and the nation, it is about sex, no ‘just’ about it.

 


[i] “High Court to Hear Student’s Case…,” The Tribune, Tempe, Arizona, Monday, January 11, 1999, pg. A9.

A Woman’s Right to Know

Published February, 2001

Theresa grabbed the side of the podium and looked out at the crowd.  She considered them friends, but this was going to be difficult.  For the first time, she would speak publicly about something that had always been private.  “I was really nervous about it.  You know, nobody ever talks about it.  I had to really…this had been so personal and private for so long, and now I would talk about it and say ‘the word.’”

Taking a deep breath, Theresa slowly began to tell about her first pregnancy and the steps that led her to have an abortion.  “It was scary when I was standing there,” as she remembers her speech.  “I could see the shock factor.  Abortion was an unspoken issue.  To talk about it in a mixed group of individuals…you could hear a pin drop.”

Nearly four years later, Theresa continues to speak publicly about her abortion experience.  She wants other women to know the facts about abortion, facts that are often hidden in the silence that surrounds the subject.

Thirty years after Roe v. Wade, over 31 million abortions have been performed in the United States.  Yet, abortion is still a subject few women feel they can discuss openly, and this helps hide the truth and facts about the physical and mental consequences connected with abortion.

Death is the ultimate harm that may come to a woman having an abortion.  One Arizona woman, LouAnne Herron, bled to death following her abortion, and Dr. John Biskind is currently on trial in Arizona Superior Court for gross negligence allegedly leading to her death.

Evidence introduced during the trial of Dr. Biskind describes a 2 inch hole in Ms. Herron’s uterus.  Such injuries to the uterus in other women, while not always leading to death, have resulted in hysterectomies and colostomies.  Even when injury to the uterus remains undetected by a woman immediately following her abortion, she may find years later that she is infertile or unable to bring a pregnancy to full term as the result of uterine scarring.

Thirty years of legalized abortion have also raised the very real evidence that abortion may cause the death of women in an unexpected way.  Researchers are busy studying the link of abortion to breast cancer.  Dr. Joel Brind, president of the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, first wrote about the link between breast cancer and abortion in 1993 for Family Voice.  He notes that 27 out of 33 studies worldwide demonstrate this ABC link.

The risks for women having abortions are serious, and women like Theresa are stepping into the public light to end the silence.  They work to educate the public at the same time that they encourage women who have had abortions to seek help.

Representative Laura Knaperek is also bringing her legislative expertise to bear on the situation.  For the third year, she will introduce a bill in the Arizona House in support of a Woman’s Right to Know.  Rep. Knaperek addressed the crowd at the January 23rd rally for Arizona Right to Life and asked them to help her see this legislation become law, guaranteeing that women will be told the truth about the real risks associated with any decision to have an abortion.

On the national level, the Texas Justice Foundation has begun a campaign to help document the truth about complications arising from abortion.  Their campaign Operation Outcry asks women “who have been harmed by abortion to use their testimony for something positive:  preventing other women from being hurt the same way.”

Operation Outcry operates a website where women can come forth and testify.  “We need women who have had an abortion(s) to fill out an affidavit form describing their experience.”  The affidavit forms are available on the web, as well as two sample testimonies filled out by Susan Renne and Sharon Blakeney.  The website also lists hot lines for women who may be suffering from abortion and need help in healing.

Theresa understands firsthand the courage women need when they make the decision to reveal their abortion for the first time.  While she still feels nervous in her public speeches, she knows she is committed to the cause of truth.  Reflecting back to her first speech, she speaks with conviction.  “That was just the beginning.  When I was done, it was a matter of relief and trust that everything was going to be OK.  No matter who heard this, even if it only reached one individual, it was 110 per cent OK.”

___________________________

Abortion Hurts Men, Too

Publish September, 2000

Impassioned discussions on abortion focus on the death of the innocent unborn and the physical and mental pain women suffer.  But there is a silent victim who remains in the background.  Abortion hurts men, too.

Larry Mann speaks to this truth.  As a newsman, he is able to look at articles on abortion with an empathetic eye.  He’s been there.  And it’s a story he is willing to share, “as a testimony for other people who have been in the same situation.”

Larry begins, “I grew up without God in my life and thought that I lived by the Golden Rule.  My own ‘golden rule,’ though.  I lived a wild and crazy, go-for-all-the-gusto, kind of lifestyle.”

He attended a social singles group and was drawn to the “cut loose and party” atmosphere.  This is where Larry met Kathy.  “She and I had an instant attraction and were at the stage where we wanted to be busy all the time, on the run.  There were tons of private parties going on.  We often attended two or three activities in the same day and seldom got home before 2:00 a.m.

“It was not a good time economically,” Larry remembers.  “It was not a good time in our relationship to want to get married.”  At this juncture in their life together, Larry and Kathy unexpectedly faced their most difficult challenge.  After only a couple of months together, “She got pregnant.  We talked about it.  She said, ‘There’s just no way I can have this child.’  And I agreed.”

Like so many couples, many factors weighed on Larry and Kathy.  Their relationship was insecure.  She was struggling to parent two girls from a previous marriage.  Larry pondered the serious responsibilities of fathering a child.  “One of my main concerns was possibly getting stuck with paying child support for the next 18 to 20 years….It was a selfish decision.”

Today, his quiet voice gives way to the pain he carries inside.  “She was seven or eight weeks pregnant.  So I took her to an abortion clinic in the Chicago area, and I paid for the abortion.  I gave her a ride.  Of course, she’s the one who had to go through the abortion.

“I’m not trying to convince anybody that I didn’t know in my own mind what was going on.  People who say that this isn’t a viable human being, I think are kidding themselves….I think I knew in my own mind exactly what I was doing, despite the fact that I didn’t know Christ.”

Following the abortion, Larry and Kathy continued their relationship.  Engaged twice, they never got married.  “Her children were just not conducive to us getting together.”  The children weren’t their only problem.  “We were so messed up and confused.  We were living a destructive lifestyle, going from one bar to another.”

Eventually, Kathy concluded that a Christian influence might be good for her daughter.  “She asked me if I would take them to church.”  They began a church search that led them one Sunday to Willow Creek Community Church.  “Bill Hybels was speaking on abortion.  Kathy just cried, the tears really welled up inside of her….I felt like he was really talking to me.  He had selected me out of the group.”

This was the beginning of the end for their relationship.  “That was where I really got touched by the spirit.  I continued to go to church.  I went in one direction, and she didn’t.”

But Larry was no easy convert.  “After I went to church that first time, I wrote a scathing letter to the church challenging them.  ‘God wasn’t any more real than the Easter bunny or Santa Claus.  What a bunch of phonies they were!’  The church turned the letter over to a man named Mark in charge of their evangelism department.  He called me and asked me to come in to talk with him.

“I agreed to do that, but I was real angry.”  Larry pushed against Mark with question after question.  Mark was patient, answering each question.  “We just kept on ‘shuffling through’ my anger and trying to figure out what I was angry about.”

When all of his questions were answered, Mark challenged Larry, “OK, so what’s holding you back now?  There’s something.  There’s something there.  What is it?”

Larry’s voice slows.  “It was at that point that I was able to say.”  He confessed to the abortion and Mark’s response was unexpected.  “He told me that God was gracious and forgiving, that there was no sin that couldn’t be forgiven if you could bring that sin to God and confess to Him.

“I had always thought of religion in the past as God being a punitive God, somebody standing behind you waiting to hit you with a two-by-four for whatever you did wrong.  Finding out the love, the grace, and the forgiveness was the turning point for me.”

In December, 1988, Larry Mann was baptized.  “The pastor of the church I went to allowed people to write their sins on a piece of paper, fold it up, and physically pin it to the cross.  I wrote one word on that piece of paper.”

Larry explains, “Dealing with that sin was the biggest stumbling block to me coming to Christ.  I have compassion for the people who have been there, whether they kidded themselves into thinking this wasn’t a human being, or whether they came to the realization later…I have a real heart for those people.”

He also has a special understanding for men who may suffer with the guilt of abortion.  “I think they just kind of sweep it under the rug….Men oftentimes consider themselves to be an island unto themselves.  To confess your weaknesses to somebody else is to make yourself vulnerable.  I think this is something that a lot of men aren’t dealing with, that figure when it happened, it was her problem.”

Larry today has a desire to reach out to anybody who is hurting from the guilt and pain of an abortion.  “The message I would like to get out is, if you’ve been through this, instead of stuffing it, figure out how to get it out and handle it.  It’s hard to grow in your faith, it’s hard to be used by God, if you have something festering in you that isn’t getting solved.  There is healing available.”

Abortion Safe? Not for LouAnne Herron

Published August, 2000

For the past 27 years, since the legalization of abortion with Roe v. Wade in 1973, supporters of abortion have maintained that it is one of the safest medical surgeries performed today.  In fact, they often say abortion is safer than a tonsillectomy.

This is of no consolation to LouAnne Herron who died in April, 1998, after her abortion performed at the A-Z Women’s Center in central Phoenix.  Next month, on September 15, the trial of Dr. John Biskind is scheduled to begin.  Maricopa County prosecutors hope to prove Dr. Biskind recklessly caused her death.  As part of the evidence to be presented in the trial, they also hope to present the cases of three other women injured in abortions performed by Dr. Biskind, one of whom also died.

LouAnne Herron is one of a long list of women who have died as the result of abortions performed legally in the United States.  One such woman, Guadalupe Negron, died following her abortion on July 9, 1993, at a Queens, New York, abortion clinic.  Like LouAnne Herron, following the abortion the practitioner ignored her for over an hour.  When she was finally transported to a nearby hospital, she died a short time later from injuries, including a three-inch rip in her uterus.  In 1995, Dr. David Benjamin was convicted of the murder of Ms. Negron.

The upcoming trial of Dr. Biskind should become a focal point for public discussion about the safety of abortion.  Many supporters of abortion cite statistics to defend abortion as a safe ‘procedure.’  However, pro-life experts raise serious objections to statistics currently available.

For instance, while death is the ultimate harm to a woman, Guadalupe Negron’s death points to the severe injuries women can suffer during an abortion.  Even if a woman survives, as the result of “blind” poking and scraping inside the uterus, she can suffer a torn or punctured uterus, bowel perforations, lacerations to the cervix, and injuries to the urinary tract.  Any of these complications can also result in severe blood loss.

Many years later, women may suffer from infertility, ectopic pregnancies, and an inability to carry a pregnancy to term.  These conditions can also be linked to injuries to the uterus and cervix caused during an abortion.

Meanwhile, major surgeries are needed to repair these injuries to women, including bowel resections, colostomies, and hysterectomies.  While not reflected in the death statistics linked to abortion, these women are definitely casualties of a serious surgery.

Mark Crutcher, president of Life Dynamics, Incorporated, collected and researched over 6,000 documents to prepare his book, LIME 5.  He writes an unflinching account of case after case where women were unnecessarily injured or recklessly killed at the hands of abortion providers.

He claims that these cases are but the “tip of the iceberg.”  One of the problems in getting full information about such injuries is that women are very reluctant to openly admit to an abortion.

Silence and secrecy are at the heart of the abortion industry.  Crutcher describes in detail how the CDC (Centers for Disease Control), helps collect data on abortions and their complications.  Of course, the CDC receives reports of injury from the actual doctors and clinics performing the abortions.  As the files at Life Dynamics disclose, if the injury can be “handled” by the abortion clinic without sending the woman to a hospital’s emergency room, the injury may never be reported at all.

In fact, former abortionists who have left the industry speak of many such cases where injuries to women were buried in special file cabinets and never reported.  Carol Everett is quite candid about her years managing several of the largest abortion clinics in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.  In her 1992 book Blood Money, she maintains, “The abortions we performed had a high rate of complication.  Our clinics completed over 500 abortions monthly, killing or maiming women at a rate of one per month.”

Perhaps the hardest complication of abortion to prove also affects the largest number of women.  Like her abortion clients, Carol Everett had an abortion in 1973.  When they married, her husband made her promise she would terminate any future pregnancy.  Twelve years after her abortion, she finally came to terms with her buried grief and regret.

Pro-abortion forces deny any such syndrome as post-abortion trauma.  Meanwhile, many organizations continue to minister to women who claim they are haunted years later by the guilt and hurt associated with their abortions.

Lori Bakker, the new bride of former evangelist Jim Bakker, herself had five abortions before she turned 22.  As a result, she was left unable to bear children.  Today the Bakkers minister to hundreds of women, helping them to come to a closure with the loss of their aborted child.  Post-abortion counseling is also offered nationwide by chapters of Crisis Pregnancy Center.

How safe is abortion?  How widespread are the physical complications and emotional suffering from abortion?  Perhaps, in September, as Dr. Biskind’s trial begins, we can begin the kind of open social dialogue that gets to the truth.  Almost thirty years after abortion was legalized, perhaps it’s time to finally bring abortion out of the shadows.  For the sake of women like LouAnne Herron, it is time to talk.

_________________________________

NOTE:  Jane Jimenez sat in court for the entire trial as testimony was given and was present as the verdict was read.

Read:  Safe and legal anniversary: Lou Anne Herron.  This story is told with accuracy and fidelity to the actual court testimony and transcripts.